The Rupert family has long stood at the centre of South Africa’s corporate story. Their enterprise spans luxury goods, banking, and investment holdings, and for decades, a single asset sat at its foundation: tobacco. In January 2025, that chapter closed.
The family’s full exit from British American Tobacco (BAT) ended a century-old industrial legacy and opened the way for a more deliberate, values-aligned repositioning. This was not a classical succession in an operating company, but a shift from an inherited manufacturing identity toward a portfolio shaped by global norms, ethical scrutiny, and the expectations of a new generation.
The Rupert succession is a study in how families use governance structures to manage history, reduce exposure to long-cycle risks, and reshape purpose across generations.
From Local Enterprise to Country-wide Influence
Anton Rupert built a small tobacco and industrial chemicals business in the 1940s that eventually morphed into a major corporate force. Under his leadership, Rembrandt grew into one of South Africa’s most influential groups, with investments in tobacco, finance, and luxury goods.
Alongside the financial architecture, Anton Rupert played a major role in South Africa’s early conservation movement. He was one of the founding patrons of the Peace Parks Foundation, established in 1997 with Nelson Mandela and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, to support transfrontier conservation areas across Southern Africa. His work in industry and conservation earned him national recognition, including the Order for Meritorious Service of South Africa.
Anton Rupert’s early businesses (Rembrandt and its later branches) operated in a way that kept most parts of the process under the same roof: manufacturing, distribution, brand development, and long-term partnerships. The family tended to make measured investments, build partnerships that lasted decades, and grow step by step, avoiding the rapid expansion that characterised many other conglomerates of the era. As a result, Johann Rupert inherited a strong set of values: patience, discipline, and the belief that consistency delivers lasting gains.
A New Leadership Style Emerging
Johann Rupert’s preparation was markedly different from his father’s. Raised in Stellenbosch but educated abroad, he developed his worldview through finance rather than manufacturing. After studying economics, he spent formative years in New York at Chase Manhattan Bank and Lazard Frères before returning home in 1979 to found Rand Merchant Bank. That early venture, which he led until 1984, established his reputation for analytical rigour and contrarian judgement. By the time he joined the Rembrandt Group, he had already built and exited a financial institution: an apprenticeship that combined entrepreneurial experience with exposure to global banking cycles.
His later achievements reflect this blend of independence and strategic caution. In 1988, he created Compagnie Financière Richemont in Switzerland, a move that separated scalable global luxury assets from South African industrial holdings and insulated the group from regional political risk. Under his leadership, Richemont became one of the world’s leading luxury conglomerates, while Remgro evolved into a diversified investment group anchored in South Africa.
Johann Rupert’s leadership philosophy is characterised by risk awareness and a deep sense of stewardship. He often remarks that he remembers the crises of 1969, 1974 and 1987 even when colleagues do not, and therefore “errs on the side of caution”. He has received numerous business honours — from the World Economic Forum’s Global Leaders of Tomorrow to several South African leadership awards — but his influence extends beyond commerce. He has been instrumental in establishing institutions that promote entrepreneurship, education and conservation, including the Small Business Development Corporation (now Business Partners Ltd), the Laureus Sport for Good Foundation, the Rupert Museum, the Michelangelo Foundation for craftsmanship, and the Peace Parks Foundation, which he chairs. He not only continued his father’s philanthropic legacy but expanded it significantly. For a dynasty whose wealth partly arose under apartheid and from tobacco, this non-financial legacy was a crucial effort in maintaining social approval and giving the next generation a broader sense of purpose.
This combination of global experience, strategic thinking and civic responsibility is embedded within the architecture of his legacy. He moved the family’s most scalable, reputation-sensitive assets into a stable European jurisdiction, while preserving a diversified base and influence in South Africa. In short, he practised a form of geopolitical risk management long before the term became fashionable.
By the 1990s, he had gathered the family’s various tobacco holdings into Rothmans International to strengthen control, simplify oversight, and compete more effectively in an industry moving toward larger global groups. This made the later Rothmans–BAT merger possible: a move that dramatically increased the value of their stake. For decades, BAT dividends and share appreciation were among the family’s most reliable sources of liquidity.
A Strategic Restructuring
The next shift came in 2008 with the creation of Reinet Investments, a dedicated vehicle that separated tobacco exposure from the broader group. By 2008, the tobacco industry faced growing regulation, shrinking margins, rising ethical concerns and reputational pressure on shareholders. Removing tobacco from the core group signalled that the Rupert family recognised the direction of global sentiment, wanted to future-proof the broader enterprise, and was preparing for a generational shift in how the family wished to be seen. By placing BAT inside a separate listed vehicle, the family created a structure in which they could sell shares gradually, reduce exposure without destabilising Richemont or Remgro, and time their later exit better. This signalled an intention to manage the legacy more actively.
During this period, the Rupert family portfolio had become almost unrecognisable when compared with its origins:
✔ Richemont – now one of the world’s largest luxury groups
✔ Remgro – diversified holdings across healthcare, infrastructure, and consumer sectors
✔ Reinet – a global investment fund with a long-horizon strategy
As Richemont (luxury goods) and Remgro (diversified investments) were no longer tied to tobacco, the market perception of those companies improved. Regulators and ESG-focused investors could now separate Rupert’s luxury and finance sectors from its tobacco history. They took the opportunity to restructure and modernise Reinet: they implemented dedicated reporting, clearer mandates, professional asset oversight and transparent valuation mechanisms. This improved governance made it easier for the family to make decisions about the long-term future of the stake, for investors to assess risk, and for advisors to plan succession and liquidity.
Activist Pressure and Full Exit
The resilience of this architecture was tested in 2022, when activist fund Bluebell Capital sought to reshape Richemont’s board and weaken the influence of the B shares. Bluebell proposed its own representative for the board and called for equal representation of A and B shareholders. Johann Rupert responded bluntly that every investor had always known the capital structure they were buying into and that the group’s brands required a patient owner. Thanks to the 51% voting block held through Compagnie Financière Rupert, the family comfortably defeated the resolutions. The episode confirmed that the control structure can withstand activist pressure, but also underscored the need to modernise the group’s wider strategic positioning.
The real break arrived in January 2025, when Reinet sold more than 43 million BAT shares — representing roughly a quarter of its net asset value — ending the family’s presence in the tobacco sector. This divestment was the culmination of a long, quiet unwind, designed to reduce reputational exposure and reposition the group for the future. Overseas tobacco interests were first gathered into Rothmans International in 1972, then folded into British American Tobacco in 1999. Richemont itself had already completed its own divestment from tobacco by 2007, positioning itself as a pure luxury group. The creation of Reinet in 2008 ring-fenced the remaining BAT exposure in a separate investment vehicle, allowing the family to reduce its stake gradually. When Reinet finally sold its BAT shares in January 2025, generating over £1.22 billion in proceeds, it brought to a close a multi-decade process of “purifying” the portfolio away from a legacy sector.
For South Africa, the Rupert story has always been tied to the country’s industrial rise: tobacco profits funded the Rembrandt conglomerate, accelerated early JSE-era corporate growth, and fuelled decades of domestic industrialisation. When Reinet completed the family’s exit from British American Tobacco in 2025, it marked more than a portfolio adjustment. It closed the founding chapter of one of South Africa’s most important industrial legacies and reflected a broader shift away from the old, manufacturing-led economy toward a globalised, service-driven business landscape. The family’s identity moved with it — from industrial group to international investment dynasty.
At present, there is no public indication of how the Rupert family plans to allocate the proceeds. The capital sits within Reinet, available for future long-term opportunities aligned with the family’s investment philosophy. Since both Richemont and Remgro operate from strong balance sheets, there is no operational need forcing a quick redeployment.
Economists have described this move as a model of responsible stewardship: recognising societal shifts, anticipating regulatory pressure, and aligning capital with the family’s maturing values.
Johann often frames his investment philosophy through the crises he has lived through, remarking that when he tells colleagues he remembers 1969, 1974 and 1987, “their eyes glaze over, but I’m afraid I do remember them, and I therefore err on the side of caution.” This generational memory is a defining feature of the group’s contrarian and defensive approach.
A Governance Architecture Built for Transition
While the family has not published a detailed succession map, Johann Rupert has stated that a plan exists and has been agreed with independent directors. The intention is to transfer control through the managing partner role at Compagnie Financière Rupert and the directorships of the key holding vehicles, rather than through public drama around share transfers. The third-generation heir, Anton Rupert Jr, has been prepared quietly but methodically for this role: a non-executive director at Richemont since 2017, with a portfolio that leans heavily towards digital strategy, online retail and technology investments. His brief is clear: to inherit the task of steering Richemont’s maisons through the next wave of digital revolution.
It also reflects Rupert’s family commitment to long-term planning and strategic preparation: investing in a long apprenticeship inside a protected structure will likely result in a smooth transition process. They’ve also constructed a layered governance system over decades, ensuring that transition did not rely on a single moment of succession. Key features of this structure include:
A dual-class control architecture
In Switzerland, Compagnie Financière Rupert holds roughly a tenth of Richemont’s equity yet commands just over half of the votes through super-voting B shares. In South Africa, Rupert Beleggings Proprietary Limited owns all of Remgro’s unlisted B ordinary shares, each carrying ten votes, translating into about 43% of total voting rights. These structures allow the family to maintain control and steer strategy across generations with minimal disruption.
Dedicated Investment Vehicles
Reinet Investments allowed the family to ring-fence legacy risk while strengthening governance discipline and transparency. It formalised reporting and long-horizon investment strategy. It also helps the execution of strategic investment decisions, such as selling the BAT shares.
Documented Transition Pathways, Clear Separation of Roles
Richemont (luxury goods) and Remgro (diversified holdings) are professionally managed, with separate boards and strong independent director presence. Johann Rupert serves as chair, but operational authority sits with seasoned executives.
Leadership expectations, responsibilities, and reporting channels are formalised. This structure reduces ambiguity, which often destabilises multi-generational families.
Key Takeaways
In short, the Rupert succession is a model for:
- Adapting family portfolios to shifting global expectations
- Maintaining relevance across generations
- Balancing legacy with ethical considerations
- Embedding governance discipline early rather than reactively
Their journey shows that family offices can evolve without rupturing internal relationships or destabilising control. Governance experts often compare the Rupert succession with the Murdoch experience. The comparison is instructive.
- Rupert: gradual transition, strong vehicle-based governance, no public family fracture
- Murdoch: rapid restructuring, centralised authority, sibling buyouts, visible tension
Both cases underscore the same lesson: structures prevent conflict when designed early, but amplify conflict when adjusted late.
The Murdoch story spotlights issues the Ruperts successfully avoided:
X Equal voting structures that become paralysing
X Unclear successor authority
X Late-stage redesign of trusts
X Tensions between personal fairness and corporate effectiveness
The Rupert family instead chose a preventative path, characterised by three principles:
1. Strategic Clarity Must Precede Market Pressure
The Rupert transition shows the benefit of reviewing legacy assets before they become liabilities.
2. Dedicated Structures Preserve Stability
Reinet’s creation insulated operations from the risk profile of tobacco, enabling long-term planning.
3. Alignment with Values Strengthens Longevity
Families that articulate and apply values consistently create portfolios with lower internal friction and higher reputational durability.
The Rupert case also teaches a key lesson to other families: Succession requires a long-term strategy, including moving away from a legacy asset, investing in the right governance structures, and aligning objectives with ethical and social expectations.
A Holistic View of the Rupert Succession
The Rupert transition is often described through the lens of assets and control, but its deeper shape comes into focus when examined through the Four Abundances: Wealth, Relationships, Time, and Purpose. Each abundance marks a generational shift from industrial legacy to global stewardship.
Wealth
The family’s wealth abundance lies in a deliberate portfolio architecture: Richemont in Switzerland, Remgro in South Africa, and Reinet in Luxembourg. The structure provides concentrated voting power, dispersed economic exposure, and the ability to make decade-length decisions without market pressure.
This abundance is, however, structural rather than liquid. The exit from British American Tobacco generated new flexibility, but historically, much of the family’s wealth has been tied to long-cycle assets where returns arrive unevenly. Richemont’s exceptional performance contrasts with the more modest outcomes at Remgro and Reinet, showing that strategic clarity, not size, drives value creation. Their wealth abundance is already refined, but it still demands continuous reinterpretation.
Relationships
Unlike many family businesses with many heirs inside the operating company, the Rupert model favours professional leadership and separates the family from operations. Relationships are maintained through board participation, philanthropic projects, and shared stewardship of the family’s South African and Swiss institutions.
The tragic death of Johann Rupert’s brother, Anthonij, in 2001 redrew the line of succession, concentrating leadership responsibility within Johann’s immediate branch. This reduced internal complexity but also placed significant expectations on the third generation. The wider family remains connected but not entangled in daily management. Their relational abundance seems structured and free of tensions common in operational family firms.
Time
Time is the most visible abundance in the Rupert story. Johann Rupert himself saw it as both a strategic asset and a personal constraint, once noting that it is “ironic that someone in the watch business should not be in control of his time.” The family has repeatedly chosen patience over speed: decades-long divestment from tobacco, measured expansion in luxury, slow unwinding of digital missteps, and a methodical third-generation apprenticeship.
Yet this same abundance can create tension. Long cycles demand vigilance, especially in sectors – such as digital luxury – where speed now defines competitiveness. The third generation inherits a structure optimised for stability, not acceleration. Their task will be to combine the patience of the past with the agility required for the future.
Purpose
Purpose for the Rupert family blends industrial heritage, South African identity, and an evolving sense of global stewardship. Closing the founding chapter of the Rembrandt empire aligned the family with sectors that carry lower ethical weight and greater cultural resonance, such as luxury craftsmanship and conservation.
The family’s philanthropic legacy gives the enterprise a civic dimension that extends beyond commerce. For the third generation, purpose is becoming more forward-looking: digital transformation, responsible deployment of capital, and the task of modernising the maisons without eroding the long-term philosophy inherited from earlier generations. Their purpose abundance is anchored in history but increasingly shaped by global expectations.
The Family Council Canvas in Action
The Four Abundances reveal a family enterprise built on structure, patience, and carefully managed distance. The FCC helps translate these qualities into a shared, transparent framework that prepares the Rupert dynasty for its next generational handover. It offers a way to articulate trade-offs, document rationale, and align long-term expectations across a global, multi-vehicle group.
Dynamics
The family’s internal dynamics are quiet by design. The architecture of control through CFR and Rupert Beleggings reduces the need for frequent negotiation, and the separation of family from operations keeps interpersonal friction low. Yet structural calm can conceal strategic blind spots.
The FCC would surface the sensitive questions that sit underneath the smooth exterior. How should the family balance control with accountability to public shareholders? What degree of transparency do third-generation members expect in a structure built for privacy? How will the family manage differing comfort levels with long-cycle investments, especially as the third generation faces sectors that move far faster than tobacco or traditional manufacturing? What expectations exist around visibility, board participation, and philanthropic leadership?
The Canvas makes implicit dynamics explicit. It gives third-generation a voice in a system historically held together by the authority and architectural discipline of the second generation, ensuring that unity continues as demographics expand and private governance becomes more demanding.
Compass
The compass for the Rupert family is defined by long-term stewardship rather than operational identity. The dual-class structures and cross-jurisdictional design make patience possible, but the next generation needs a more articulated set of shared principles.
The FCC would clarify what control means going forward: preservation, influence, or the authority to pursue contrarian strategies? Is the purpose of Richemont to remain independent at all costs, or is independence a tool for brand longevity? How much risk is the family willing to take in digital reinvention? What weight should be given to the family’s conservation and cultural legacy when making future investment decisions?
A well-defined compass ensures that the third generation inherits both mechanisms of control and the understanding of how and why to use them.
Journey
The Rupert journey spans three distinct eras: industrial ascent (G1), structural engineering and global diversification (G2), and digital transition (G3). Much of this history lives in governance structures and corporate transactions rather than in a shared narrative.
The FCC would help document the rationale behind the Richemont–Remgro split, the long arc of exiting tobacco, the private apprenticeship of the third generation, the significance of maintaining South African philanthropic roots while expanding globally, and the meaning of dual-class control as a multi-generational tool rather than a defensive tactic.
This historical mapping gives the third generation a coherent storyline: not “what the family owns,” but “why the family made these choices.” Without this, the structure risks becoming opaque, and later generations may misinterpret the purpose of the system they inherit.
Goals & Actions
The Rupert governance architecture is strong, but its effectiveness depends on disciplined next-generation stewardship. The FCC would translate the family’s inherited strengths into clear commitments for the years ahead.
- Strengthen G3 readiness
Create a formal development plan for emerging leaders (board rotations, digital strategy roles, multi-jurisdictional exposure). Clarify the criteria for entering family governance roles within CFR and Rupert Beleggings.
- Refresh the family’s definition of control
Decide which aspects of the dual-class system are non-negotiable. Establish principles for when to use, defend, or relax control mechanisms.
- Align digital strategy with patience-based governance
Agree on acceptable time horizons for digital reinvention, acknowledging that G3 faces sectors with different rhythms from traditional luxury. Define the decision-making threshold for external partnerships or acquisitions in tech.
- Deepen the link between capital deployment and family purpose
Establish guidelines for investments in conservation, culture, and responsible innovation. Review whether the family wishes to reallocate a portion of post-BAT liquidity into mission-aligned assets.
- Create a shared communication framework
Document the logic of past structural decisions so G3 and G4 inherit a transparent rationale. Agree on what the public narrative of the family should be: industrial heritage, global stewardship, or something evolving.
The Family Council Canvas becomes the bridge between the family’s structural abundance and its future relevance. The Rupert succession is already built on discipline, patience, and architecture; the Canvas provides the shared language that allows these strengths to evolve without losing coherence.
Closing Reflection
The Rupert family has successfully built a carefully designed ecosystem of voting arrangements, holding companies, and jurisdictional choices that protect long-term thinking in an environment where most listed groups must answer to short-term market sentiment.
This architecture has allowed the family to close an entire industrial chapter and reposition its identity. It has also given them the freedom to rethink their legacy, resist activist pressure, and manage a discreet generational handover without unsettling the companies they oversee.
If the Murdoch succession illustrates the strain of governance and family expectations falling out of sync, the Rupert case shows the opposite: what becomes possible when the legal and organisational scaffolding is strong enough to support large-scale shifts.
Johann said that “Trends carry on forever, until they stop. I want to be around after things come to a standstill. As a result, I tend to be pretty conservative.” This remark captures both his scepticism of market enthusiasm and his insistence on surviving the turn in the cycle. It is this conservatism that the architecture of his legacy is based on.
The Rupert enterprise enters its next era with a rare advantage: secure control, stable capital, and evolving purpose. Whether that becomes a source of renewed innovation or a constraint on adaptation will depend on how the third generation interprets their heritage.
Disclaimer: This article is a case study based on publicly available information and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The analysis and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not constitute factual claims about the private lives or intentions of the individuals discussed. The use of any copyrighted material is done for the purposes of commentary and criticism and is believed to fall under the principles of fair use. All images are used with attribution to their known sources.
Sources:
AdvisoryCloud (n.d.). Uncovering the Secrets to Success of Billionaire Johann Rupert. Available at: https://advisorycloud.com/blog/uncovering-the-secrets-to-success-of-billionaire-johann-rupert (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
BusinessTech (2024). Billionaire Johann Rupert’s incredible charity work in South Africa. Available at: https://businesstech.co.za/news/business/773926/billionaire-johann-ruperts-incredible-charity-work-in-south-africa/ (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
BusinessTech (2024). The man who will take over the R209 billion Rupert empire. Available at: https://businesstech.co.za/news/wealth/805240/the-man-who-will-take-over-the-r209-billion-rupert-empire/ (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Investec Wealth & Investment (n.d.). The Rupert companies: Lessons in wealth creation and diversification. (Author: Brian Kantor). Available at: https://www.investec.com/en_za/focus/investing/the-rupert-companies-lessons-in-wealth-creation-and-diversification.html (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Legends and Legacies of Africa (n.d.). Anton Rupert. Available at: https://legendsandlegaciesofafrica.org/antonrupert.php (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Michelangelo Foundation (n.d.). Johann Rupert. Available at: https://www.michelangelofoundation.org/en/johann-rupert (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Philanthropies.org (n.d.). Johann Rupert. Available at: http://philanthropies.org/johann-rupert/ (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Remgro Limited (n.d.). Company History. Available at: https://www.remgro.com/about-remgro/history/ (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Wikipedia (n.d.). Richemont. Available at:(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richemont) (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
Wikipedia (n.d.). Anton Rupert. Available at:(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Rupert) (Accessed: 1 December 2025).
